My life has been crazy the past few weeks. Well... if I'm being honest, my life has been crazy for the past few months, but the craziness has escalated drastically in the past few weeks.
To give a short run down:
I was offered a new, full-time job in Salt Lake City. So I quit my beloved job at the Orem Public Library, started a new job, and moved to Salt Lake. All of this happened in approximately a three week period. Lightening speed.
I have a lot of emotions about this abrupt change in my life; excitement, enthusiasm, anxiety, stress, sadness, eagerness. It's all happened so fast but it's all fallen into place so easily. It feels like the right change for me but it's still a very hard transition.
Oddly enough, the thing I'm most sad about with all of this is having to quit my job at the library.
I LOVE the Orem Library. I always have.
I remember going there on a weekly basis with my best friend, Aimee, and her mom as a kid. Aimee would check out 20-30 books at a time... I would check out one (it's called pacing yourself, Aimee). We would head back to her house and read for hours in her room. Maybe not the typical behavior of 10 year-olds but it worked for us.
As I got older going to the library became a habit of life. Sometimes, as an angsty teenager, I would (ahem) ditch school and go hang out at the library with my friends. We were all about sticking it to the man for the sake of REAL knowledge, yo! It's how I became friends with Jack Kerouac and Ken Kesey.
I have lots of friends who go for drives up the canyon or to the temple when they're feeling upset. I have always gone to the library to calm down when I'm feeling anxious or when I need to work through some emotions. I like to go to the Storytelling Wing and look at the beautiful puppet stage there and think.
So, two years ago when I applied to work at my beloved library (for approximately the sixth time in my life) and they actually interviewed me for a job AND hired me I was overwhelmed with the honor. I could finally work at the Happiest Place in Orem. During my entire time working there I have never had a day when I dreaded coming to work.
To give a small example of how much I've loved working there: in my entire working career I have ALWAYS made sure that I had the day off for my birthday. It you don't know, my birthday is kind of a big deal. I always ensure that I do whatever I personally want to do on that day because it's a holiday all about me and I'm going to celebrate. For the past two years I've gone to work on my birthday because the place I wanted to be was at work.
Why has working at the library been so special for me? There are lots of reasons for that. The people who work there are among the friendliest, most accepting people I have had the privilege of working with. My eyes have been opened to all sorts of books and knowledge I would have never thought to pick up otherwise.
I think the biggest reason I have loved working at the library so much is because I can see that I am making a quantifiable difference in the lives of the people living in the city of Orem.
A library is a magical place. It is the most accepting place in the world. It is a place where thoughts and ideas and opinions can mix together without fear. This is possibly the cheesiest line possible (but it also holds a lot of truth): as long as there are libraries I don't think we have to fear for our future.
Thank you to the Orem Public Library for giving me the opportunity to be with you and get to know your secret inner workings (spoiler alert: librarians use Google just as often as the rest of us). You will always be the standard to which I compare all other libraries to. I wish I could have stayed with you longer but your budget won't allow for my current needs. It's ok though, I forgive you.
No matter where I go or what I do, going to the Orem Library will always feel like coming home.
Thursday, April 14, 2016
Monday, January 4, 2016
Reflections on School
I officially graduated from college last month. After nine years, two colleges, and three (very) different majors I've finally joined the masses of underemployed college graduates.
Hurray!
To put it simply, it has been intense. The past five years have been especially harrowing. To give you a sense of just how much work has gone into this I went through my closet and pulled out all of my sketchbooks from my years in the illustration program at UVU....
I also pulled out every assignment, project, and painting I've done over the past 5 years (give or take, since I've sold some of them)...
Hurray!
To put it simply, it has been intense. The past five years have been especially harrowing. To give you a sense of just how much work has gone into this I went through my closet and pulled out all of my sketchbooks from my years in the illustration program at UVU....
In case you can't tell, that's 32 sketchbooks.
I also pulled out every assignment, project, and painting I've done over the past 5 years (give or take, since I've sold some of them)...
I didn't bother counting these ones but to give you an idea of how much work that is I know there are over 60 of those small paintings on the top alone.
Needless to say I have dedicated my life to this. Every hour that I haven't spent at work or sleeping has been spent on art. I have sacrificed weekends and every social engagement possible to work on improving my craft.
Now that school is over I feel tired, worn out, despondent, and slightly terrified. I've come a long way but I still feel under qualified to enter the professional work force. Nevertheless I am excited for what comes next! The great thing about the art world (and probably most decent human beings) is everyone recognizes there is room for improvement and that you don't stop progressing the second you have a diploma in hand.
Recently I've had this terrible feeling that I've digressed as an artist. I've fallen into the especially dangerous trap of comparing my work to other people's work. So it was a bit reassuring to find the very first drawing I did way back in Drawing I during Spring semester in 2011 and compare it with one of the last drawings I did during my last semester. The first one is a tricycle and the last one is a nude figure (fair warning for people that have issues with naked people). It might have been a better idea to compare a figure with a figure but whatever...
I had TWO HOURS to draw this tricycle and THIS is all I did?!
I took this picture on my phone and had to tilt the camera to get the whole figure in the shot so the proportions are a little skewed.
This blog post is a bit unfocused (this is due in part to fact that I'm also watching the Great British Baking Show) but I'd like to take a moment to sincerely thank everyone for their support during my school days. It has been an arduous journey and I have not always been a pleasure to be around during that time. Thank you for your patience, encouragement, occasional purchases, and love. I'm so grateful to all of my teachers, my friends, my fellow students, and my family. I have learned so much from you and I feel a profound sense of joy to be associated with all of you.
Now... before this starts to sound too much like an award show acceptance speech....
It's time to get back to drawing!
Much Love;
Virginia May
Tuesday, December 22, 2015
Star Wars: the Poster Awakens!
I've been an utter flake with the whole blog thing this year. What can I say? I've been... busy. I should have figured my blog would go the way of my journal: sporadic and impatiently written on a perhaps twice yearly basis. Whatevs. I'm not all that torn up about it since this blog was originally started as a place to word vomit opinions that didn't belong elsewhere (it may have since devolved into a crazy person ranting about certain giants of the animation industry but that's beside the point). The only thing that makes me regret my inconsistent blogging habits are you devoted fans who sit at home sighing all day long, just waiting for a new blog post from yours truly. I'm sure there are many of you out there whose only ray of sunshine in your dreary lives is the occasional rantings of a bizarrely impassioned animation enthusiast. To you poor people I humbly apologize and make the friendly suggestion that perhaps you find a hobby. Preferably one that allows you to breath fresh air and interact with other humans.
Now, this year's goal was to watch all the Studio Ghibli movies and I'm sad to say I failed. I don't even think I made it half way through. In my defense I've been preoccupied with many other more pressing matters. Namely graduating college (FINALLY) and this.....

And by this I mean this actual poster and not the movie (although to be fair, I did wait in a line for approximately 20 hours at SDCC to see the Star Wars panel so it's not a far stretch to say I've also been preoccupied with the actual movie).
Let me explain....
There is a magical illustrator in the world by the name of Drew Struzan. He is the most famous illustrator that everyone knows but no one has heard of. He is the artist behind just about every movie that came out in the 80's and 90's including (but not limited to): Back to the Future I, II, and III, Indiana Jones, Hook, Harry Potter, An American Tail, Ducktails the Movie, The Great Muppet Caper, The Goonies, Hocus Pocus, Hellboy.... have I made my point yet? Oh, and he also did the posters for Star Wars I, II, III, IV, V, VI.
He was also commissioned to make a poster for episode VII. It looks like this:

Mr. Stuzan's poster was commissioned as a teaser. It wasn't intended to be the official movie theater poster. So why am I so peeved?
Because the official movie theater poster sucks.
Listen. I am officially a graduate with a BFA in illustration. I'm allowed to be pretentious about this. But I'm also inclined to explain my reasoning so let's talk about the specific issues I have with this poster
Leading Lines
The direction that lines are facing is important to the success of any composition. Line work (both actual and implied lines) usually points in the direction the artist wants the viewer to look. Instead of pointing to the action like they should, most of the lines in this poster are leading the eye off the page... the number one place that lines should never lead the eye.

I get wanting the lines to radiate from the center and in some places that works but that whole right side of the image does not work for me.
Tangents
A tangent in art terms is a space where the eye gets stuck. Instead of gliding through a composition effortlessly the viewer gets caught in an awkward artistic traffic jam and ends up fixating on parts of the image that are irrelevant. This can happen with weird line intersections, awkward overlaps, or lines that are too close to each other. If you're an artistic genius like Gary Kelley you can use tangents to your advantage and totally rock it. That is not the case with this poster. Here are some of the places where my eye gets stuck:
And I don't even think I found them all.
Low Contrast
Our eyes are naturally drawn to points of high contrast. That's why in this poster the first thing you notice is Rey. The next thing you notice are all the lightsabers. These are bight points against dark backgrounds. The issue here is in that point directly below Rey smack dab in the middle of the image where everything is smooshed together and it's hard to separate one character from the other. I mean, Han's hair meshes with Leia's hair which meshes with Chewie's hair. And it took me forever to notice that C3PO is in there along with R2D2. Poe Dameron also starts to blend in with the explosions below him as well as BB-8.

Oh, and I guess Maz is in there too...
Noise
This is just straight laziness now.
For those of you who aren't familiar with Photoshop there is a filter you can add to an image called Noise. Basically what it does is create a layer of what looks like TV static over your image. I will admit to having used it in some of my own images before but I don't like it. It looks cheap and lazy and slightly amateur. Noise also has a tendency to make things look pixelated even when they aren't. It's things like Noise that make people think that digital art is somehow easier than traditional art.
Well, this little poster is brimming with Noise.

Noise, like tangents, can be used rather expertly from time to time but this is not one of those times.
To conclude, I am whole heartedly an art snob (and I have a degree to prove it!) and I think this post above all others illustrates that point. But that doesn't negate the fact that I am right (DANG IT!)! This poster is an embarrassment to the legacy of Star Wars poster art and the moral of the story is: when given a choice, stick with Struzan.
Now, this year's goal was to watch all the Studio Ghibli movies and I'm sad to say I failed. I don't even think I made it half way through. In my defense I've been preoccupied with many other more pressing matters. Namely graduating college (FINALLY) and this.....

And by this I mean this actual poster and not the movie (although to be fair, I did wait in a line for approximately 20 hours at SDCC to see the Star Wars panel so it's not a far stretch to say I've also been preoccupied with the actual movie).
Let me explain....
There is a magical illustrator in the world by the name of Drew Struzan. He is the most famous illustrator that everyone knows but no one has heard of. He is the artist behind just about every movie that came out in the 80's and 90's including (but not limited to): Back to the Future I, II, and III, Indiana Jones, Hook, Harry Potter, An American Tail, Ducktails the Movie, The Great Muppet Caper, The Goonies, Hocus Pocus, Hellboy.... have I made my point yet? Oh, and he also did the posters for Star Wars I, II, III, IV, V, VI.
He was also commissioned to make a poster for episode VII. It looks like this:

Mr. Stuzan's poster was commissioned as a teaser. It wasn't intended to be the official movie theater poster. So why am I so peeved?
Because the official movie theater poster sucks.
Listen. I am officially a graduate with a BFA in illustration. I'm allowed to be pretentious about this. But I'm also inclined to explain my reasoning so let's talk about the specific issues I have with this poster
Leading Lines
The direction that lines are facing is important to the success of any composition. Line work (both actual and implied lines) usually points in the direction the artist wants the viewer to look. Instead of pointing to the action like they should, most of the lines in this poster are leading the eye off the page... the number one place that lines should never lead the eye.

I get wanting the lines to radiate from the center and in some places that works but that whole right side of the image does not work for me.
Tangents
A tangent in art terms is a space where the eye gets stuck. Instead of gliding through a composition effortlessly the viewer gets caught in an awkward artistic traffic jam and ends up fixating on parts of the image that are irrelevant. This can happen with weird line intersections, awkward overlaps, or lines that are too close to each other. If you're an artistic genius like Gary Kelley you can use tangents to your advantage and totally rock it. That is not the case with this poster. Here are some of the places where my eye gets stuck:
And I don't even think I found them all.
Low Contrast
Our eyes are naturally drawn to points of high contrast. That's why in this poster the first thing you notice is Rey. The next thing you notice are all the lightsabers. These are bight points against dark backgrounds. The issue here is in that point directly below Rey smack dab in the middle of the image where everything is smooshed together and it's hard to separate one character from the other. I mean, Han's hair meshes with Leia's hair which meshes with Chewie's hair. And it took me forever to notice that C3PO is in there along with R2D2. Poe Dameron also starts to blend in with the explosions below him as well as BB-8.

Oh, and I guess Maz is in there too...
Noise
This is just straight laziness now.
For those of you who aren't familiar with Photoshop there is a filter you can add to an image called Noise. Basically what it does is create a layer of what looks like TV static over your image. I will admit to having used it in some of my own images before but I don't like it. It looks cheap and lazy and slightly amateur. Noise also has a tendency to make things look pixelated even when they aren't. It's things like Noise that make people think that digital art is somehow easier than traditional art.
Well, this little poster is brimming with Noise.

Noise, like tangents, can be used rather expertly from time to time but this is not one of those times.
To conclude, I am whole heartedly an art snob (and I have a degree to prove it!) and I think this post above all others illustrates that point. But that doesn't negate the fact that I am right (DANG IT!)! This poster is an embarrassment to the legacy of Star Wars poster art and the moral of the story is: when given a choice, stick with Struzan.
Thursday, June 18, 2015
The Difference Between American Wildlife and Japanese Wildlife
I am getting WAY behind on my blog posts kiddos! The last movie I blogged about was My Neighbor Totoro and since then I have watched an additional four movies. I think that means it's time to play catch up!
Kiki's Delivery Service

I love this movie because I am a functioning human and it's impossible not to love this movie if you fit that criteria.
Kiki is a charming 13 year old witch who has moved away from home in order to complete her witches training. It has always tickled me that she decides to open up a flying delivery service. The idea is so far fetched and anti-stereotypical of a witch that it breaths fresh air into the very concept of witches and witchcraft. And what's additionally phenomenal is that Kiki acts her age! She's crazy awkward with boys and really self-conscious about her appearance. She carries around a lot of self doubt and insecurities. I think a big reason why she's so endearing to the general public (really why a lot of Studio Ghibli characters are so endearing) is that her character is so believable.
Mr. Myazaki has mentioned that he created the town Kiki goes to as a sort of generic European town borrowing from a lot of different architectural designs ranging from Sweden to Germany to Italy. He also created the timeline that Kiki inhabits as a place where WWII never happened. So I guess in a world where The Great War really was the war to end all wars zeppelins are still a cool and viable mode of transportation and not a gigantic hydrogen bomb waiting to explode. Although I suppose that Kiki's utopian society still discovered that travel by balloon isn't exactly a sane option.
Only Yesterday

A 27 year old woman who has been dubbed a hopeless spinster takes a two week summer vacation in order to work on a farm harvesting flowers to be made into dyes. She tells a local guy boring stories about when she was 10. Then she has an awkward conversation with his family where they try to convince her to move to the country and marry the guy which she ultimately decides to do. I kid you not, that is the entire plot of this movie.
There's a reason this is the only Studio Ghibli movie that was never translated and distributed in America.
Porco Rosso

This movie will always remind me of a tedious road trip I took with my family to California and my then 2 year old nephew who screamed "PORCO ROSSO" every time we tried to play a different movie in the DVD player and who then proceeded to fall asleep when we finally turned it on, but if you tried to put in something else he'd inexplicably wake up and scream for Porco Rosso again.
Fond memories.
The movie however, is fun and lighthearted about a man who has been cursed to look like a pig. It never explains why he was cursed or how/if the curse can be lifted. Nope. He's just a pig man and that's that.
I would really like someone to explain to me why he is a pig.
Pom Poko

A delightful movie about a group of raccoons who attempt to sabotage a housing development that is threatening to take over their natural habitat. They fail and then disguise themselves as humans in order to live among them undisturbed. There's a moral in there somewhere too... I'm sure you can figure out what it is.
I love this movie. I think this is my favorite Studio Ghibli movie thus far. The animation style is the most creative (in this person's most humble and 100% accurate opinion) and the characters are simply delightful. It also deals very strongly with Japanese folklore....which means I probably should have watched it in Japanese but there are a myriad of reasons why I didn't. None of which I'm going to elaborate on.
And speaking of Japanese mythology... if you aren't too much of a prude to watch this movie you'll notice a stark difference in animal anatomy between a Japanese raccoon and an American one (at least in regards to the opinions of the animation industry and not actual physical raccoon anatomy). However, said anatomy is necessary in order to maintain the accuracy of the Japanese folklore being portrayed. I could lecture as to why this isn't inappropriate but I think this post is long enough as it is.
Until next time...
Kiki's Delivery Service
I love this movie because I am a functioning human and it's impossible not to love this movie if you fit that criteria.
Kiki is a charming 13 year old witch who has moved away from home in order to complete her witches training. It has always tickled me that she decides to open up a flying delivery service. The idea is so far fetched and anti-stereotypical of a witch that it breaths fresh air into the very concept of witches and witchcraft. And what's additionally phenomenal is that Kiki acts her age! She's crazy awkward with boys and really self-conscious about her appearance. She carries around a lot of self doubt and insecurities. I think a big reason why she's so endearing to the general public (really why a lot of Studio Ghibli characters are so endearing) is that her character is so believable.
Mr. Myazaki has mentioned that he created the town Kiki goes to as a sort of generic European town borrowing from a lot of different architectural designs ranging from Sweden to Germany to Italy. He also created the timeline that Kiki inhabits as a place where WWII never happened. So I guess in a world where The Great War really was the war to end all wars zeppelins are still a cool and viable mode of transportation and not a gigantic hydrogen bomb waiting to explode. Although I suppose that Kiki's utopian society still discovered that travel by balloon isn't exactly a sane option.
Only Yesterday
A 27 year old woman who has been dubbed a hopeless spinster takes a two week summer vacation in order to work on a farm harvesting flowers to be made into dyes. She tells a local guy boring stories about when she was 10. Then she has an awkward conversation with his family where they try to convince her to move to the country and marry the guy which she ultimately decides to do. I kid you not, that is the entire plot of this movie.
There's a reason this is the only Studio Ghibli movie that was never translated and distributed in America.
Porco Rosso

This movie will always remind me of a tedious road trip I took with my family to California and my then 2 year old nephew who screamed "PORCO ROSSO" every time we tried to play a different movie in the DVD player and who then proceeded to fall asleep when we finally turned it on, but if you tried to put in something else he'd inexplicably wake up and scream for Porco Rosso again.
Fond memories.
The movie however, is fun and lighthearted about a man who has been cursed to look like a pig. It never explains why he was cursed or how/if the curse can be lifted. Nope. He's just a pig man and that's that.
I would really like someone to explain to me why he is a pig.
Pom Poko

A delightful movie about a group of raccoons who attempt to sabotage a housing development that is threatening to take over their natural habitat. They fail and then disguise themselves as humans in order to live among them undisturbed. There's a moral in there somewhere too... I'm sure you can figure out what it is.
I love this movie. I think this is my favorite Studio Ghibli movie thus far. The animation style is the most creative (in this person's most humble and 100% accurate opinion) and the characters are simply delightful. It also deals very strongly with Japanese folklore....which means I probably should have watched it in Japanese but there are a myriad of reasons why I didn't. None of which I'm going to elaborate on.
And speaking of Japanese mythology... if you aren't too much of a prude to watch this movie you'll notice a stark difference in animal anatomy between a Japanese raccoon and an American one (at least in regards to the opinions of the animation industry and not actual physical raccoon anatomy). However, said anatomy is necessary in order to maintain the accuracy of the Japanese folklore being portrayed. I could lecture as to why this isn't inappropriate but I think this post is long enough as it is.
Until next time...
Friday, May 29, 2015
My Neighbors are WAY More Interesting Than Yours!
You know what's a great thing to follow the world's saddest movie with? The world's happiest and most child friendly movie!
And if IMDb is to be believed Grave of the Fireflies and My Neighbor Totoro were actually released as a double feature in Japan because Studio Ghibli didn't have confidence that Totoro would bring in enough money as a stand alone movie. Coincidentally it didn't do well until they started mass producing toys from the movie two years later. I have a theory that the real reason it didn't do so well in theaters is because it was shown as a double feature with THE WORLD'S SADDEST MOVIE. But that could just be me.
Oddly though, I think My Neighbor Totoro actually does make a good follow up to Grave of the Fireflies. Totoro portrays a historically ambivalent time period that could easily be considered the early to mid 1950's. Hard times have come and gone and the future is bright and optimistic. There is what could be considered a residue of said hard times (i.e. mom stay's in a hospital for the duration of the movie) but there's still a permeating feeling that everything will work out ok. It could also be argued that this movie is a reflection of Miyazaki's post-war childhood experience. His mother did spend many years in and out of hospitals as she suffered with tuberculosis and he has admitted to the semi-autobiographical nature of this story.
Anyways, I'd say the best word that could be used to describe My Neighbor Totoro would be enchanting. It so perfectly encapsulates what it is to be young and still unabashedly believe that the world is full of magic. If at all possible I would recommend watching this movie with a little person. I watched it with my 4 year old niece and it was delightful.
And can we talk about character design for a moment? I am 100% certain that the reason this movie did so well from it's merchandising is because the character of Totoro was designed so well he was basically screaming to be made into a giant plush toy.
Speaking of the character of Totoro, Mr. Miyazaki has actually mentioned that the character is not based on anything in Japanese mythology or folklore. He wanted to create a creature that could be universally embraced by all world cultures. If he actually succeeds in this endeavor is up for debate but it did make me feel justified in watching it in English.
Up next: enter a world where World War 2 never happened and witchcraft is a lighthearted and whimsical entity.
Tuesday, April 28, 2015
The Saddest Movie You'll Ever See
Sigh... I've become quite the shoddy blogger as of late. There are many factors that have contributed to this influx of lackadaisical writing habits of which I won't get into but I think the main factor that has made me put of writing this particular blog post is the subject matter.
For those of you who haven't been following this year's blog theme I'm watching Studio Ghibli movies. Studio Ghibli is known for their charming stories with whimsical and fantastical settings that take your breath away. However, Ghibli also has a very melancholy and dark side that a lot of fans of the studio have a tendency to judiciously overlook. That rather depressing side of an otherwise lighthearted animation studio is made manifest in the movie Grave of the Fireflies and as far as sad movies are concerned this one takes the cake.

I first saw Grave of the Fireflies when I was roughly nine years old at my friend's house. I got away with seeing a lot of movies and TV shows that I wouldn't have otherwise seen at this particular friend's house but I honestly wonder how I ever got away with this one. It's probably because the movie is animated that it was initially branded as a harmless thing to exploit a child to. And this movie is the number one example I site when explaining to people why animation is not a medium that should be relegated strictly to the realm of childish entertainment. It is a very serious film that details with very serious ideas and it is unforgiving in its presentation of those ideas.
Here's a brief synopsis of the movie:
Two children are living in Tokyo with their mother during WWII. Their father is in the navy and is stationed on a ship somewhere in the Pacific. The children get separated from their mom during a firebombing raid. Shortly thereafter the mom dies from the severity of her burn wounds during the raid and the children are shipped off to distant relatives that they barely know and who are not at all pleased to have two extra mouths to feed.
The older of the two children is a boy, about 12 years old. He struggles to take care of his little sister and due to constant antagonisms from the woman they're living with decides to move his sister into an abandoned shelter/storage area positioned next to a lake. This is where things get really hard for the two kids. Food becomes harder and harder to come by, especially for two kids living "off the grid" and the boy resorts to stealing food and raiding people's houses in order to take care of his little sister. Eventually he learns that his father has died in an attack some months earlier. Then his little sister dies of starvation and he follows shortly thereafter.
The End.
Is everyone good and depressed now?
Listen, my intention with this particular post is not to bum everyone out (although that will probably be a side effect) but I have a couple of things to point out that I've learned from this movie.
1. Animation is a very powerful medium that is significantly undervalued.
Because a character is being presented as abstract (i.e. animated) and not tangible (i.e. live-action) it creates a sense of universality. The kids in Grave of the Fireflies could be anyone, they can more easily be related to children that you personally know. And this story is an unfortunately common one for citizens of war torn countries.
Not to mention since animation is a medium that is usually relegated to the realm of children's entertainment it works well to heighten the horror of the story. Think about the juxtaposition: a terrible war story told through a child's medium. It works incredibly well to elevate the sorrow of the film.
2. War effects everyone.
I think popular media has worked well to give us the impression that war only effects the army, or those people that deserve it. But that is hardly the case. The opposing army is only a fraction of the people involved in a war. Every soldier fighting on the front lines has a mother and father and many of them have children and spouses. Those people not only have to deal with the absence of a family member but they also have to worry about their own safety, where their next meal is coming from, where they're going to sleep at night. And what happens to the children when the parents aren't there to take care of them?
I don't mean to sound so despairing about all of this but I'm an American and these are issues my country has only had to deal with minimally. We're an amazingly blessed nation that has never been invaded and has only minutely had to deal with war caused disasters on our own turf. Very few of us have seen what sort of effect this level of conflict can have on a community. I would say it's fair to compare America as a nation to a teenager: we think we're invincible, the world is our oyster, we have a very optimistic perspective on the future, etc. All of these things are really great but I would say that as a whole we are also a very naive country. We think we know everything but on the grand scale we haven't experienced much.
Now, I'm not saying America deserves to be invaded so that we can see what it's like from the other side. No one ever deserves that. Ever. And I'm not saying we shouldn't have entered into conflict with Japan during WWII. I'm just saying we should maybe be a bit more prudent in why we're picking a fight with someone.
Anyways, I would not recommend showing this movie to any nine year-olds that you might know. But if you are an adult reading this blog post and you haven't seen this movie yet I would recommend that you watch it. Not so much for entertainment value (does anyone every consider movies like this entertaining?) but possibly to give some extra perspective and compassion. And maybe raise the question of what it means to go to war.
Good thing the next movie Studio Ghibli came out with after this one was My Neighbor Totoro!
Oh, and as an extra note: this is my 50th blog post. So hurrah for me! It only took 3ish years to get here.
For those of you who haven't been following this year's blog theme I'm watching Studio Ghibli movies. Studio Ghibli is known for their charming stories with whimsical and fantastical settings that take your breath away. However, Ghibli also has a very melancholy and dark side that a lot of fans of the studio have a tendency to judiciously overlook. That rather depressing side of an otherwise lighthearted animation studio is made manifest in the movie Grave of the Fireflies and as far as sad movies are concerned this one takes the cake.

I first saw Grave of the Fireflies when I was roughly nine years old at my friend's house. I got away with seeing a lot of movies and TV shows that I wouldn't have otherwise seen at this particular friend's house but I honestly wonder how I ever got away with this one. It's probably because the movie is animated that it was initially branded as a harmless thing to exploit a child to. And this movie is the number one example I site when explaining to people why animation is not a medium that should be relegated strictly to the realm of childish entertainment. It is a very serious film that details with very serious ideas and it is unforgiving in its presentation of those ideas.
Here's a brief synopsis of the movie:
Two children are living in Tokyo with their mother during WWII. Their father is in the navy and is stationed on a ship somewhere in the Pacific. The children get separated from their mom during a firebombing raid. Shortly thereafter the mom dies from the severity of her burn wounds during the raid and the children are shipped off to distant relatives that they barely know and who are not at all pleased to have two extra mouths to feed.
The older of the two children is a boy, about 12 years old. He struggles to take care of his little sister and due to constant antagonisms from the woman they're living with decides to move his sister into an abandoned shelter/storage area positioned next to a lake. This is where things get really hard for the two kids. Food becomes harder and harder to come by, especially for two kids living "off the grid" and the boy resorts to stealing food and raiding people's houses in order to take care of his little sister. Eventually he learns that his father has died in an attack some months earlier. Then his little sister dies of starvation and he follows shortly thereafter.
The End.
Is everyone good and depressed now?
Listen, my intention with this particular post is not to bum everyone out (although that will probably be a side effect) but I have a couple of things to point out that I've learned from this movie.
1. Animation is a very powerful medium that is significantly undervalued.
Because a character is being presented as abstract (i.e. animated) and not tangible (i.e. live-action) it creates a sense of universality. The kids in Grave of the Fireflies could be anyone, they can more easily be related to children that you personally know. And this story is an unfortunately common one for citizens of war torn countries.
Not to mention since animation is a medium that is usually relegated to the realm of children's entertainment it works well to heighten the horror of the story. Think about the juxtaposition: a terrible war story told through a child's medium. It works incredibly well to elevate the sorrow of the film.
2. War effects everyone.
I think popular media has worked well to give us the impression that war only effects the army, or those people that deserve it. But that is hardly the case. The opposing army is only a fraction of the people involved in a war. Every soldier fighting on the front lines has a mother and father and many of them have children and spouses. Those people not only have to deal with the absence of a family member but they also have to worry about their own safety, where their next meal is coming from, where they're going to sleep at night. And what happens to the children when the parents aren't there to take care of them?
I don't mean to sound so despairing about all of this but I'm an American and these are issues my country has only had to deal with minimally. We're an amazingly blessed nation that has never been invaded and has only minutely had to deal with war caused disasters on our own turf. Very few of us have seen what sort of effect this level of conflict can have on a community. I would say it's fair to compare America as a nation to a teenager: we think we're invincible, the world is our oyster, we have a very optimistic perspective on the future, etc. All of these things are really great but I would say that as a whole we are also a very naive country. We think we know everything but on the grand scale we haven't experienced much.
Now, I'm not saying America deserves to be invaded so that we can see what it's like from the other side. No one ever deserves that. Ever. And I'm not saying we shouldn't have entered into conflict with Japan during WWII. I'm just saying we should maybe be a bit more prudent in why we're picking a fight with someone.
Anyways, I would not recommend showing this movie to any nine year-olds that you might know. But if you are an adult reading this blog post and you haven't seen this movie yet I would recommend that you watch it. Not so much for entertainment value (does anyone every consider movies like this entertaining?) but possibly to give some extra perspective and compassion. And maybe raise the question of what it means to go to war.
Good thing the next movie Studio Ghibli came out with after this one was My Neighbor Totoro!
Oh, and as an extra note: this is my 50th blog post. So hurrah for me! It only took 3ish years to get here.
Thursday, March 12, 2015
A Letter from a Beleaguered Fan
Dear Disney Corporation;
Let me begin by expressing my deep gratitude and admiration for all the hard work and wonderfully artistic talent you've inspired throughout the years. I'm sure I'm not alone in expressing this, and I'm positive you get this all the time but, I know I wouldn't be the person I am today without many of your beautiful and uplifting movies. I know I am truly blessed to have grown up during the Disney Renaissance of the 1990's. I was inspired everyday as a child by the idea that with kindness and determination I could do or be whatever I wanted. What a profound honor that has been.
Animation has mesmerized me my entire life. As a child I used to watch my Saturday morning cartoons with a touch of amazement and wonder "How do they do that?" I remember going to see Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin in theaters and I felt that I had truly found magic in the world and that that magic was created in the fantastic world of animation. So thank you for enchanting my childhood.
I am now in my senior year of college finishing up a degree in illustration. I have made it a hobby of mine to study animated movies. I like to consider how well a story is told, what point is trying to be made, and how well the movie elevates the art form of animation. I don't consider myself by any means an expert but I do have loud opinions on the subject and for the most part I consider those opinions viable.
Now, my dear Disney, you've had your Renaissance, you had an awkward transition phase as you tried to figure out how digital animation works, I feel now that you've moved into a Rococo phase in your progression of the art of animation. I say Rococo because I feel like many of your recent movies are full of needless opulence and that they greatly lack substance. They are formulaic and slightly mundane (granted, the storylines of the 90's were also very formulaic but each movie was very stylistically unique). They're just a bunch of fluff. Your characters no longer come across as really feeling anything. They've become actors portraying someone else's emotions. Take for example the absolutely stunning scene in which Pinocchio finally becomes a real boy. That scene was so carefully created that I was convinced that animated drawing was truly a 3-dimensional boy who had gained something significant and who deserved it. I could feel his joy at the accomplishment he had earned.
I haven't seen that level of a character's conviction since maybe Mulan.
What's happened to you Disney? Have you become so confident in your successes that you no longer feel the need to push yourself? Are you no longer interested in growing an art form? Do you feel that you have deserved the privilege of resting on your laurels?
I feel as though you're no longer interested in further innovations in storytelling. Sure, you're still trying to experiment with animation and pushing the technological advancements of the medium and for that I applaud you. But you no longer seem interested in telling important stories in an unapologetic manner. You seem to have lost the part of your soul that cares about saying something that matters. And that fact makes me deep and miserably sad.
And now it looks as though the only thing you're interested in doing is rehashing your previous successes. I see these ads for your live action Cinderella and I wonder "Why?" There's nothing there that hasn't been said before. Then I see that you have a live action Beauty and the Beast in the works and the same bitter question rolls through my mind. Then comes the announcement of a live action Dumbo, a movie that really had something significant and special to say and that took the art of animation to a whole new place and I lament the lack of creativity I see seeping out of your corporation. You won't make any of these stories better by retelling them, you only diminish some of their splendor by sheepishly admitting you think you can do them better than their creators did.
And then this afternoon I come across this most egregious of announcements and I have to admit it's made me nearly give up on the future of my most beloved art form:
http://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/frozen-2-is-official-110332.html
Why Disney? Why do you insist on doing this? Here is the most shallow, opulent, lacking in conviction, Rococo-esque movie I believe you've ever come out with and now you've seen fit to expand the vapidness by creating a sequel to this mess. As your continuing greed mounts the one thing I've consistently held to is the fact that Disney creates so few canonized sequels to their movies. Dreamworks and Pixar seem to create nothing but sequels but not you Disney, you've got a loftier goal than high box office returns. But now you've gone and announced this embarrassment and my confidence in you sinks further and further into the void.
If the only aim to your enterprise is to create commercial success then please stop lying to the public and telling us that your sole desire is to uplift the masses and give them bright shining hope for the future. You aren't doing that; you're padding your retirement fund and buying private islands in the Caribbean and referring to that as good for everyone.
You've made me very sad Disney and I'm tired of watching you sink into vanity. Please reconsider the work that you're doing and the purpose for doing it and raise to the challenge of creating something better.
Sincerely;
A Concerned and Wavering Fan
Let me begin by expressing my deep gratitude and admiration for all the hard work and wonderfully artistic talent you've inspired throughout the years. I'm sure I'm not alone in expressing this, and I'm positive you get this all the time but, I know I wouldn't be the person I am today without many of your beautiful and uplifting movies. I know I am truly blessed to have grown up during the Disney Renaissance of the 1990's. I was inspired everyday as a child by the idea that with kindness and determination I could do or be whatever I wanted. What a profound honor that has been.
Animation has mesmerized me my entire life. As a child I used to watch my Saturday morning cartoons with a touch of amazement and wonder "How do they do that?" I remember going to see Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin in theaters and I felt that I had truly found magic in the world and that that magic was created in the fantastic world of animation. So thank you for enchanting my childhood.
I am now in my senior year of college finishing up a degree in illustration. I have made it a hobby of mine to study animated movies. I like to consider how well a story is told, what point is trying to be made, and how well the movie elevates the art form of animation. I don't consider myself by any means an expert but I do have loud opinions on the subject and for the most part I consider those opinions viable.
Now, my dear Disney, you've had your Renaissance, you had an awkward transition phase as you tried to figure out how digital animation works, I feel now that you've moved into a Rococo phase in your progression of the art of animation. I say Rococo because I feel like many of your recent movies are full of needless opulence and that they greatly lack substance. They are formulaic and slightly mundane (granted, the storylines of the 90's were also very formulaic but each movie was very stylistically unique). They're just a bunch of fluff. Your characters no longer come across as really feeling anything. They've become actors portraying someone else's emotions. Take for example the absolutely stunning scene in which Pinocchio finally becomes a real boy. That scene was so carefully created that I was convinced that animated drawing was truly a 3-dimensional boy who had gained something significant and who deserved it. I could feel his joy at the accomplishment he had earned.
I haven't seen that level of a character's conviction since maybe Mulan.
What's happened to you Disney? Have you become so confident in your successes that you no longer feel the need to push yourself? Are you no longer interested in growing an art form? Do you feel that you have deserved the privilege of resting on your laurels?
I feel as though you're no longer interested in further innovations in storytelling. Sure, you're still trying to experiment with animation and pushing the technological advancements of the medium and for that I applaud you. But you no longer seem interested in telling important stories in an unapologetic manner. You seem to have lost the part of your soul that cares about saying something that matters. And that fact makes me deep and miserably sad.
And now it looks as though the only thing you're interested in doing is rehashing your previous successes. I see these ads for your live action Cinderella and I wonder "Why?" There's nothing there that hasn't been said before. Then I see that you have a live action Beauty and the Beast in the works and the same bitter question rolls through my mind. Then comes the announcement of a live action Dumbo, a movie that really had something significant and special to say and that took the art of animation to a whole new place and I lament the lack of creativity I see seeping out of your corporation. You won't make any of these stories better by retelling them, you only diminish some of their splendor by sheepishly admitting you think you can do them better than their creators did.
And then this afternoon I come across this most egregious of announcements and I have to admit it's made me nearly give up on the future of my most beloved art form:
http://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/frozen-2-is-official-110332.html
Why Disney? Why do you insist on doing this? Here is the most shallow, opulent, lacking in conviction, Rococo-esque movie I believe you've ever come out with and now you've seen fit to expand the vapidness by creating a sequel to this mess. As your continuing greed mounts the one thing I've consistently held to is the fact that Disney creates so few canonized sequels to their movies. Dreamworks and Pixar seem to create nothing but sequels but not you Disney, you've got a loftier goal than high box office returns. But now you've gone and announced this embarrassment and my confidence in you sinks further and further into the void.
If the only aim to your enterprise is to create commercial success then please stop lying to the public and telling us that your sole desire is to uplift the masses and give them bright shining hope for the future. You aren't doing that; you're padding your retirement fund and buying private islands in the Caribbean and referring to that as good for everyone.
You've made me very sad Disney and I'm tired of watching you sink into vanity. Please reconsider the work that you're doing and the purpose for doing it and raise to the challenge of creating something better.
Sincerely;
A Concerned and Wavering Fan
Friday, February 20, 2015
Warriors of the Wind
Oh hello, I didn't see you there!
Today I'm following the usual protocol: I have a million things to do and I'm tired out of my mind so naturally it's time to update my blog.
I've actually been staying pretty on top of my Ghibli movie watching spree. It's surprisingly easy to do when you have consistent free access to a gigantic film collection (thank you Orem Public Library!). Today I'm going to talk Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind and Castle in the Sky.
Nausicaa has a very long and semi-interesting history about how it got to America. It's pretty dramatic to some people (myself included, at least the first time I heard it) and if you're really curious you can read about it (here) but I'm lazy and I don't think the story is relevant so I'm not going to discuss it further.

If I wanted to get technical about it Nausicaa actually isn't an official Ghibli movie since it's creation pre-dates the official founding of the studio but it is ceremoniously considered the first Studio Ghibli film. Which I think is a good thing because Nausicaa blows Castle in the Sky out of the water in terms of awesomeness.
Nausicaa is very obviously a Miyazaki film. He has a tendency to recycle the following themes: environmentalism, feminism, pacifism, loving relationships (not just romantic love), and flying....the guy really has a thing for flying mechanisms. Nausicaa is super heavy handed with the environmentalism and pacifism themes. In fact, the environmental plot line in this movie could almost be used as an allegory for pacifism.
Allow me to explain:
Nausicaa takes place in a post-apocalyptic future where, due to tampering with technologies too powerful for mankind to handle, humanity has essentially destroyed the ecosystem and created a vast and deadly toxic jungle infested by gigantic hostile insects. However with time and a lack of tampering the jungle is purifying itself, a fact that is unbeknownst to most of the population. In addition, the Valley of the Wind has learned that by harnessing wind power and generally leaving the jungle alone they are able to live peacefully. If they try to hack away at the jungle it only leads to the spread of noxious spores and death. By this we learn that aggression only leads to greater calamity and chaos and if we chose not to become entangled in futile troubles then things have a tendency to work themselves out and we are better for it.
Another big theme not just Studio Ghibli movies but in a lot of animes in general is the fatality of tampering with technologies that we don't fully understand and that could have major repercussions. This is a big reflection on modern Japanese history. You may have heard of a little incident that happened way back when referred to as "World War II." If you're unaware of how that war ended in Japan it happened when America dropped two giant ass bombs, vaporizing countless people in seconds and killing countless more in the weeks, months, and years following the event. In fact, to this day Japan still feels the repercussions to that catastrophic event. A small one of those repercussions is the realization of the frailty of man. This idea is reflected rather subtly in Nausicaa with the inclusion of the character Kushana who makes a disturbing implication to being more metal than flesh and bone due to a previous encounter she had with an insect. Also the inclusion of the "God Warriors" with their horribly destructive powers that nearly wiped out the entire human population and lead to the creation of the toxic jungle. Ok....so that one's not so subtle but it still gets the point across.

All in all Nausicaa is a pretty rad movie. It's not the most refined of Miyazaki's films but it still does a bang up job and it gets the point across.
Castle in the Sky however....
This movie is mediocre at best. It still deals with themes of peace and environmentalism(ish) and flying machines are heavily featured but there isn't really a progression in story. And the themes seem to simply be slapped onto the end as an afterthought. All in all it's pretty crude for Miyazaki and when it's compared to all his other work it falls a little flat.
And that's all for now!
Next time we'll discuss the world's most depressing movie and the great atrocities war can exploit children to....specifically children.
Cheerio!
Today I'm following the usual protocol: I have a million things to do and I'm tired out of my mind so naturally it's time to update my blog.
I've actually been staying pretty on top of my Ghibli movie watching spree. It's surprisingly easy to do when you have consistent free access to a gigantic film collection (thank you Orem Public Library!). Today I'm going to talk Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind and Castle in the Sky.
Nausicaa has a very long and semi-interesting history about how it got to America. It's pretty dramatic to some people (myself included, at least the first time I heard it) and if you're really curious you can read about it (here) but I'm lazy and I don't think the story is relevant so I'm not going to discuss it further.
If I wanted to get technical about it Nausicaa actually isn't an official Ghibli movie since it's creation pre-dates the official founding of the studio but it is ceremoniously considered the first Studio Ghibli film. Which I think is a good thing because Nausicaa blows Castle in the Sky out of the water in terms of awesomeness.
Nausicaa is very obviously a Miyazaki film. He has a tendency to recycle the following themes: environmentalism, feminism, pacifism, loving relationships (not just romantic love), and flying....the guy really has a thing for flying mechanisms. Nausicaa is super heavy handed with the environmentalism and pacifism themes. In fact, the environmental plot line in this movie could almost be used as an allegory for pacifism.
Allow me to explain:
Nausicaa takes place in a post-apocalyptic future where, due to tampering with technologies too powerful for mankind to handle, humanity has essentially destroyed the ecosystem and created a vast and deadly toxic jungle infested by gigantic hostile insects. However with time and a lack of tampering the jungle is purifying itself, a fact that is unbeknownst to most of the population. In addition, the Valley of the Wind has learned that by harnessing wind power and generally leaving the jungle alone they are able to live peacefully. If they try to hack away at the jungle it only leads to the spread of noxious spores and death. By this we learn that aggression only leads to greater calamity and chaos and if we chose not to become entangled in futile troubles then things have a tendency to work themselves out and we are better for it.
Another big theme not just Studio Ghibli movies but in a lot of animes in general is the fatality of tampering with technologies that we don't fully understand and that could have major repercussions. This is a big reflection on modern Japanese history. You may have heard of a little incident that happened way back when referred to as "World War II." If you're unaware of how that war ended in Japan it happened when America dropped two giant ass bombs, vaporizing countless people in seconds and killing countless more in the weeks, months, and years following the event. In fact, to this day Japan still feels the repercussions to that catastrophic event. A small one of those repercussions is the realization of the frailty of man. This idea is reflected rather subtly in Nausicaa with the inclusion of the character Kushana who makes a disturbing implication to being more metal than flesh and bone due to a previous encounter she had with an insect. Also the inclusion of the "God Warriors" with their horribly destructive powers that nearly wiped out the entire human population and lead to the creation of the toxic jungle. Ok....so that one's not so subtle but it still gets the point across.
All in all Nausicaa is a pretty rad movie. It's not the most refined of Miyazaki's films but it still does a bang up job and it gets the point across.
Castle in the Sky however....
This movie is mediocre at best. It still deals with themes of peace and environmentalism(ish) and flying machines are heavily featured but there isn't really a progression in story. And the themes seem to simply be slapped onto the end as an afterthought. All in all it's pretty crude for Miyazaki and when it's compared to all his other work it falls a little flat.
And that's all for now!
Next time we'll discuss the world's most depressing movie and the great atrocities war can exploit children to....specifically children.
Cheerio!
Monday, January 26, 2015
All the Greats Have to Start Somewhere
Oh hey
internet!
Long time no
see. How is everyone?
As a
previously announced at the end of last year, this year’s movie watching
challenge takes me across the sea to the mystical island nation of Japan and
the Japanese version of the Disney Studio: Studio Ghibli.
Now, before I
get started on this I feel like a few things need to be explained:
1. I like
Japanese Anime. I am not an anime fanatic. For me, anime is just like any other
animation medium: some of it is good and some of it is terrible. I am
incredibly picky about the anime I will watch and I’m not a purist about the
anime I watch – as in, I will watch it in English if possible because more
often than not I’m too lazy to read my cartoons (there are, of course,
exceptions). I don’t have Japan envy and I don’t think that everything produced
by their animation industry is entertainment gold. I give this disclaimer
because there is a severe stereotype out there when it comes to people who
watch anime: that they’re crazy fanatics who will watch anything made in Japan
without discrimination, they have major Japan-envy, and even if the opportunity
doesn’t present itself they will talk about anime with anyone and everyone
whether or not the other party is interested in hearing anything about it. I
have met these people, I know they exist; I get along with some of them, most
of them I get annoyed with almost instantly.
2. Hayo
Miyazaki is an incredible animating genius, he is not God. I like Miyazaki’s
work. I am always impressed with the beauty and obvious care taken in each of
his movies. His production value is (almost) unmatched. However, I do not think
everything he’s ever made is worth watching all the time. Sometimes I think his
storylines genuinely suck and sometimes I think his themes get a little bit
repetitive. Also, he is not the only director worth mentioning who has worked
for Studio Ghibli. In fact, he is not the only director working for Studio Ghibli.
I know, it’s shocking, but there are other directors making incredible movies
in Japan and I will discuss them during this year’s animation rants.
Although I
have to give kudos to Miyazaki for name recognition. Is there any average
animation lover that can tell me the various directors that have worked at
Disney/Pixar over the years? I mean, most people know the name of John Lasseter
and maybe Brad Bird, but does anyone know who actually directed Snow White and
the Seven Dwarfs? I know it may shock you but Disney did not direct most (if
any) of the movies produced by his studio.
3. Japan has
a culture that’s different from America’s culture. This may seem like a given
but you’d be surprised how many people I talk to that don’t like Ghibli movies
because they’re “too weird” or they “didn’t get it.” That’s cool, you aren’t
obligated to like or get every movie that you see. It doesn’t mean you are a
cultural bigot. However, I think that frequently this happens because people go
into these movies with a Western frame of mind. They have no understanding of
the cultural, political, religious, or mythological context that is portrayed
or implied in a Ghibli movie. Sometimes a small amount of research is needed in
order to comprehend and truly appreciate what’s going on in a foreign film.
That is especially true of a Miyazaki film, you have to have some understanding
Shinto beliefs, Japanese mythology, and the impact World War 2 had on Japan
(both physically and metaphysically). Actually, I shouldn’t limit that to just
Miyazaki, I’d say you’ll have a greater comprehension of anime in general if
you take the time to learn a little bit about Japan.
Now that I've got all those disclaimers out of the way let's get started!
Now then, Studio Ghibli's first film is technically Castle in the Sky. Although most people usually consider Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind to be Ghibli's first film even though the movie's release predates the founding of Studio Ghibli.
However, I decided to take a step even further back in Ghibli history and kicked this animation year off with Mr. Miyazaki's directorial debut: Lupin III: The Castle of Cagliostro. For those of you not familiar with this movie, allow me broaden your horizons. Lupin III was an anime show based on a manga series (or comic book if you're an American) that debuted in the 1970's. It follows the escapades of the gentleman thief Arsene Lupin III. They used to show it late at night on Adult Swim back in the day when Adult Swim mainly played anime and not a bunch of crazy who-knows-what's-happening-I'm-not-even-sure-if-this-can-be-categorized-as-animation. I have never been able to sit through an entire episode of Lupin III. It is silly, the characters are obnoxious and I'm never sure what's going on.
In short, it is the polar opposite of anything you would ever expect Miyazaki to be associated with. I guess that just goes to show that all the greats have to start somewhere.
It has the faintest hints of the later Miyazaki movies we will all come to idol worship: It features a flying contraption (in this case a helicopter) and the vehicle designs are very Miyazaki-esque; they're all sleek lines and very curvy. The scenery is very pretty, but not in a quintessential Miyazaki way - it's just pretty.
This is perhaps the least feminist movie Miyazaki has ever produced. Which is probably another example of the fact that Miyazaki was doing this for a paycheck and not because he's really passionate about Lupin III.
The Castle of Cagliostro also features a samurai for some reason. He doesn't do much at all for the entire movie except sit around and at the end he cuts through a stone statue with his samurai sword and says "my blade can cut through anything." (Like people were actually questioning a samurai's sword's ability to cut things up.) He's probably in the movie because he's in the show but I could be wrong. As stated before, I could never sit through a whole episode. Maybe they felt like throwing a samurai in there for funsies. Or maybe it's because they thought the plot seemed too Western so they needed to remind people that this is a JAPANESE film dang it! If that's the case, wouldn't that be considered racist on their part? Or is it racist if they're doing it to themselves?
And that's all for this week!
Tune in next time for the exploits of Nausicaa and Sheeta!
Now that I've got all those disclaimers out of the way let's get started!
Now then, Studio Ghibli's first film is technically Castle in the Sky. Although most people usually consider Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind to be Ghibli's first film even though the movie's release predates the founding of Studio Ghibli.
However, I decided to take a step even further back in Ghibli history and kicked this animation year off with Mr. Miyazaki's directorial debut: Lupin III: The Castle of Cagliostro. For those of you not familiar with this movie, allow me broaden your horizons. Lupin III was an anime show based on a manga series (or comic book if you're an American) that debuted in the 1970's. It follows the escapades of the gentleman thief Arsene Lupin III. They used to show it late at night on Adult Swim back in the day when Adult Swim mainly played anime and not a bunch of crazy who-knows-what's-happening-I'm-not-even-sure-if-this-can-be-categorized-as-animation. I have never been able to sit through an entire episode of Lupin III. It is silly, the characters are obnoxious and I'm never sure what's going on.
In short, it is the polar opposite of anything you would ever expect Miyazaki to be associated with. I guess that just goes to show that all the greats have to start somewhere.
It has the faintest hints of the later Miyazaki movies we will all come to idol worship: It features a flying contraption (in this case a helicopter) and the vehicle designs are very Miyazaki-esque; they're all sleek lines and very curvy. The scenery is very pretty, but not in a quintessential Miyazaki way - it's just pretty.
This is perhaps the least feminist movie Miyazaki has ever produced. Which is probably another example of the fact that Miyazaki was doing this for a paycheck and not because he's really passionate about Lupin III.
The Castle of Cagliostro also features a samurai for some reason. He doesn't do much at all for the entire movie except sit around and at the end he cuts through a stone statue with his samurai sword and says "my blade can cut through anything." (Like people were actually questioning a samurai's sword's ability to cut things up.) He's probably in the movie because he's in the show but I could be wrong. As stated before, I could never sit through a whole episode. Maybe they felt like throwing a samurai in there for funsies. Or maybe it's because they thought the plot seemed too Western so they needed to remind people that this is a JAPANESE film dang it! If that's the case, wouldn't that be considered racist on their part? Or is it racist if they're doing it to themselves?
And that's all for this week!
Tune in next time for the exploits of Nausicaa and Sheeta!
Saturday, December 20, 2014
How Hiro Became a Hero
I don’t think I’ve kept it as much of a secret that I’ve
been gravely disappointed in Disney Feature Animation for the past year.
However, I did see Big Hero 6 last
month when it came out and I will admit that it satiated some of my displeasure (although at this point they’d have to go to
some drastic lengths in order to clear up all of my displeasure).
Here are some of the things that impressed me about BH6:

A simple,
straightforward plot. I don’t know if you've noticed this, but Disney doesn't seem to do so well when they try to complicate their story lines. A few
good examples of this are Frozen, Brother Bear, Home on the Range and Chicken
Little. Basically if they try to have too many things going on at once it
becomes fogged up. Let me highlight what I’m talking about with the following
example:
In Brother Bear
there is the main character who is embarrassed by the sacred religious totem he
receives, gets in a fight with his brothers, turns into a bear, befriends (ish)
a baby bear, goes on a mystical quest to regain his human form, discovers that
he killed baby bear’s mom, doesn't even make the minimum requirement of
apologizing for murder to baby bear, doesn't patch things up with his still
living brother, and decides to remain a bear. In the meantime Bear-boy’s
brother goes on a revenge quest in order to kill the bear he presumes killed
his brother not knowing that the bear he’s set out to kill actually is his
brother in bear form and when he discovers that said bear actually is his
brother he decides not to kill him but he also doesn't take the time to patch
things up with him and instead chooses to sweep the whole nasty drama under the
rug. On top of this baby bear decides to blindly follow a stranger around in
the hopes that this stranger will be able to reunite him with the mom that he doesn't know is dead yet and whom this stranger actually killed and when he
does discover that this stranger he’s put all his trust into actually is a
murderer he shrugs it off for some reason and decides to continue to chum
around with the guy that killed his mom (stranger danger much?). Also, there
are moose with crazy Canadian accents wandering around for unknown reasons reinforcing
all stereotypes about Canada that are in the book. Not to mention the
mysterious clan wise woman who shows up for maybe five minutes and is never
heard from again, the totem animals with their vague symbolism that is a far
stretch in order to make any of them fit into the story, and the changing
screen sizes and you have a nice mess of complicating a plot far more than is
humanly necessary. I mean, what moral are you supposed to get from this story?
Instead of solving your problems sweep them under a rug? Take lightly the sacred
things in your life whether they be your religion or your familial
relationships? Don’t own up to the mistakes you’ve made in the past? Who’s side
are we, as the audience supposed to be on? The murder’s? The vengeful sibling’s?
The naïve bear’s?
This is what happens when you try to shove too much into a
story: a confusing, forgettable mess.
Now then, BH6 deals with some complex themes and concerns
but presents them in a simple and straightforward manner. Doing this makes the
characters and their emotional turmoil a lot more relatable to a general
audience. The plot focuses on the issues of one main character (not three) and
how he deals with them. Hiro is an overly intelligent kid who is full of
himself (like any overly intelligent kid I’ve ever met) he’s also acquainted
with loss and as a result he relies on his brother for a lot of his nurture and
support. Which is why the loss of his brother is such a huge blow (also, you
know, losing someone important to you is always a huge blow…). So the whole
point of this movie is to watch as Hiro learns to cope with loss. It’s actually
pretty inspiring to watch as he accepts his brother’s death and tries to honor
his legacy by always helping those in need.
Believable(ish )
technology. I’m sure all of you sat through the credits in this movie…not
only to get to the extra little tidbit at the end but as a way of saying thank
you to the numerous people that worked hard to make this movie worth watching.
And I’m sure as all of you were sitting through the credits you were actually
reading them and taking the time to consider how grueling it must be to put an
animated feature together. And I’m sure as you were reading the credits you
noticed the incredibly long list of universities, libraries, and research
facilities that were listed as places where the animators went to make sure all
of their science was plausible and accurate. At least…plausible and accurate enough.
This is why the villain uses microbots instead of an earlier concept of some
sort of super suit or why Honey-Lemon’s Power-Purse isn’t full of micro-sized
interdimensional wormholes but is a miniature factory for producing her
chemical balls (because that’s marginally more plausible).
Ok, so not all the science in this movie is entirely
coherent. The teleportation device is a little far-fetched and the idea that if
someone were caught in a malfunctioning teleporter they would be safely tucked
away in a comatose state in hyperspace is a bit too much to plausibly wrap my
head around. But at least it was theoretically researched instead of completely
made up.
Cultural mash-ups.
I like the idea that one day in the distant future we’ll live in a society so
intermixed that they’ll change the name of San Francisco into something more
Asian-friendly (instead of the Spanish-friendly name that it currently rocks).
I feel like they mostly did this because the animation industry has a big crush
on Japan right now. And can you blame them? Like many people I suffer from
acute Asia envy.
All joking aside, I think this cultural mash-up is really
well handled. The Asian references are so casual that it makes them read as
natural. Nothing in the background of the movie is over explained or hyped up.
It doesn’t draw attention to itself; it’s just present, the way it would
actually be in real life. This gives the movie a sense of reality lacking in
other movies that attempt to do the same thing.
Baymax. I almost
think this one goes without saying. Talk about a well-designed character just
ready to be converted into a fluffy plush. And he’s actually incorporated into
the story instead of tacked on in a blatant attempt to make mass-market plush
dolls as a way to milk the general public for one more dollar (I’m looking at
YOU Olaf!). And let’s not forget his adorable, child-like personality and that
very fine way of performing a fist-bump… It brings to mind fond memories of
myself and my darling sister Penny during our high school days.
Now then, here are the things with which I was unimpressed
by in BH6:
Boring character designs.
This is only a partial grievance. It’s been a long standing tradition at Disney
that the main character looks like an everyday person: no real defining
characteristics, kind of bland. They do this intentionally as a way to make the
main character more relatable. That way you can easily swap out the main
character for yourself. That’s cool and all but sometimes I wish that main
character’s face had more personality to it, give him a scar or a broken nose
or something.
And speaking of character design, let’s talk about
Honey-Lemon. Don’t get me wrong, I really like her design. She’s like
Pop-Culture-Nerd Barbie and I like that a lot. You get her personality perfectly
just by looking at her. However, if this quote from the character designer for
Honey-Lemon is anything to go by there’s just one thing missing from her look:
“In terms of design
she was the toughest to crack.. How to design a girl who is of latino descent,
loves japanese fashion, while also is a geek about chemical engineering?"
Ok, I can get that this lady is into Japanese fashion and
culture, I can totally get behind the love of chemical engineering; the part
that I have a hard time wrapping my head around is that Latino descent bit.
Really?? I mean….REALLY?? This girl’s got a white complexion, blonde hair, and
green eyes. I get that there are some people down in Argentina that probably
look like this but for the most part when I think of Latino descent green eyes
and blonde hair aren’t defining traits I consider. She looks more like a So-Cal
beach girl than she does anything else.
And speaking of cultural confusion, Hiro’s aunt is very
obviously a white lady. I’ve already mentioned that I really like the culture
mash going on in this movie and I get that it’s obviously a racially mixed
family and that’s cool…kudos to them and all that. I also understand that it’s
not necessarily viable to the plot that it be explained which of Hiro’s parents
is Asian and which is not and in fact taking the time to do so would detract
from the plot and remove the audience from the artificial reality created by
the movie. So really this is something I want cleared up for my own curiosity.
Which parent was of Japanese descent?
Here are a few miscellaneous things for your consideration:
Did anyone else think that it was outrageously cool that
Hiro casually has a 3D printer in his garage?
I was very smitten with the fact that the whole hero
entourage’s outfits didn’t look as polished as say Peter Parker’s does (and
that’s something I’ve always wondered about: how does a teenage kid with the
resources that Peter has come up with a perfectly polished spandex unitard?).
It further heightens the sense of reality that everyone has these great
superhero costumes with a handmade/cosplay sort of look to them. I mean, Hiro
wears regular jeans with his outfit.
And speaking of Hiro’s costume, does it bother anyone else
that he doesn’t provide himself with any other protection than a very
detachable robot? I mean, for the most part Baymax does a really great job of
defending Hiro but there was at least one part during the climactic fight scene
where I was just waiting for Hiro to pull a back-up defense plan out of his
pocket and he didn’t. Lame!
Well, it feels like this post is a bit more long winded than
usual. I guess I had a lot more to say about Big Hero 6 than I thought I would. In any case, it feels like an
excellent way to wrap up my blog for 2014.
Until next time, Happy Holidays!
Sunday, December 7, 2014
Like Mother Like Daughter or, Why Merida's Mom is Better Than Merida
So I might have been a little misleading at the end of my last post when I mentioned Brave.
Yes, I have a mouthful to say about Brave, and yes, it might get a little ranty but it probably won't get ranty in the way you're probably thinking it will. As it is I actually don't have any issues with the movie... I mostly take issue with people's reactions to this movie.
Allow me to explain: from what I can tell there are three group of people for this movie; the first group thinks of this movie as a knock-off of Brother Bear, the second group feels as though Brave is a mixture of two movies that have been poorly smooshed together, the third group is the Merida-worshiping feminists.
My response to the first group is an exasperated ??? WHA?? How can you...? Sputter....mutter.....various noises. Is it because people turn into bears?? Because that is truly the ONLY common ground I can find between Brave and Brother Bear. The latter has SO many problems with plot, and theme, and moral to the story that I honestly can't formulate proper sentences when I try to explain why Brother Bear is SUCH a bad movie. I mean, it's an embarrassingly bad movie. If I had worked on this movie I would be embarrassed to put it on my resume. It's just....
And I've heard this comparison from MULTIPLE people.

My response to the second group is some straight up confusion. I've heard this critique from a few completely unrelated sources now and since I've heard similar criticisms about other Pixar movies so I can't help but give this complaint some legitimacy. The confusion comes in because I've had some friends note a clear shift in feel where it seems to move from one movie to another and I honestly can't find where this shift is. Is there anyone out there that would be willing to point it out where this shift takes place and explain what these two different movies are? Because I see this movie and all I can think is there is one clear plot that is well articulated and moves fluidly.
Now this third group is where things get sticky. Allow me to explain:
I have nothing against feminists, I'd be lying if I said gender equality wasn't something we should be striving to achieve in our culture and everyday life. What gets to me is this idea that Merida is a great example of a "Strong Female Character" because she refuses to get married at the tender age of 16 and because she can shoot an arrow. I don't know how these two characteristics translate to female empowerment. Because if you ask me, Merida is stubborn, disrespectful, selfish, proud and rude. Don't get me wrong, I really like Merida as a character, but is she a great example of a good upstanding human being who handles her problems in a mature and understanding way? No.... I mean, she POISONS HER MOM!
Now, if you ask me, if you want a fine example of a strong woman you should check out Merida's mom, Elinor. There's a woman that can stop a fight by simply walking into it. Literally! Not to mention teaching her daughter the importance of putting the needs of the community above her own. She worries about the wellbeing and safety of others. She works hard to ensure the peace of her nation. When Elinor throws Merida's bow in the fire her remorse over the action is immediate because she recognizes the item as something important to her daughter. Whereas, when Merida ruins her mom's tapestry she doesn't even feel shame over ruining all of her mother's hard work. Not to mention Merida disappears after the archery contest her mom's response upon her return is "I was so worried!" Merida's response is to poison her. Granted, she was way off on the whole "a marriage will solve all our problems" bit. I mean, there's no way a marriage would make every clan happy in this movie's scenario. That's pretty obvious from the get go. Sure, she's a pretty traditional lady, what with the lack of combat knowledge and the cleanliness but, I'm all for her!

I will throw Merida a bone, she progresses miraculously throughout the movie and by the end of the story she turns into, well, a great woman very similar her mom.
And speaking of family relations, that is the number one thing I like the most about this movie: it portrays a fully functioning family with both a father and a mother that are actively engaged in the lives of their children. How often do you see that in mainstream entertainment? It is deeply refreshing. In fact, if you want my humble opinion (and obviously you do), if you want to know what makes strong, confident, young women it's parents that are involved in their children's lives.
As a final note: I watched Monster's University and was surprised by how much I didn't dislike it. What I wasn't impressed with is the Pixar short that accompanies it: Blue Umbrella. I'm pretty sure I've seen this short before, only it was called Johnnie Fedora and Alice Blue Bonnet and it came out as part of the movie Make Mine Music in 1946. C'mon Pixar, you can do better.
And this concludes my rather shameful year of Pixar.
Coming up next year: Studio Ghibli!
Yes, I have a mouthful to say about Brave, and yes, it might get a little ranty but it probably won't get ranty in the way you're probably thinking it will. As it is I actually don't have any issues with the movie... I mostly take issue with people's reactions to this movie.
Allow me to explain: from what I can tell there are three group of people for this movie; the first group thinks of this movie as a knock-off of Brother Bear, the second group feels as though Brave is a mixture of two movies that have been poorly smooshed together, the third group is the Merida-worshiping feminists.
My response to the first group is an exasperated ??? WHA?? How can you...? Sputter....mutter.....various noises. Is it because people turn into bears?? Because that is truly the ONLY common ground I can find between Brave and Brother Bear. The latter has SO many problems with plot, and theme, and moral to the story that I honestly can't formulate proper sentences when I try to explain why Brother Bear is SUCH a bad movie. I mean, it's an embarrassingly bad movie. If I had worked on this movie I would be embarrassed to put it on my resume. It's just....
And I've heard this comparison from MULTIPLE people.

My response to the second group is some straight up confusion. I've heard this critique from a few completely unrelated sources now and since I've heard similar criticisms about other Pixar movies so I can't help but give this complaint some legitimacy. The confusion comes in because I've had some friends note a clear shift in feel where it seems to move from one movie to another and I honestly can't find where this shift is. Is there anyone out there that would be willing to point it out where this shift takes place and explain what these two different movies are? Because I see this movie and all I can think is there is one clear plot that is well articulated and moves fluidly.
Now this third group is where things get sticky. Allow me to explain:
I have nothing against feminists, I'd be lying if I said gender equality wasn't something we should be striving to achieve in our culture and everyday life. What gets to me is this idea that Merida is a great example of a "Strong Female Character" because she refuses to get married at the tender age of 16 and because she can shoot an arrow. I don't know how these two characteristics translate to female empowerment. Because if you ask me, Merida is stubborn, disrespectful, selfish, proud and rude. Don't get me wrong, I really like Merida as a character, but is she a great example of a good upstanding human being who handles her problems in a mature and understanding way? No.... I mean, she POISONS HER MOM!
Now, if you ask me, if you want a fine example of a strong woman you should check out Merida's mom, Elinor. There's a woman that can stop a fight by simply walking into it. Literally! Not to mention teaching her daughter the importance of putting the needs of the community above her own. She worries about the wellbeing and safety of others. She works hard to ensure the peace of her nation. When Elinor throws Merida's bow in the fire her remorse over the action is immediate because she recognizes the item as something important to her daughter. Whereas, when Merida ruins her mom's tapestry she doesn't even feel shame over ruining all of her mother's hard work. Not to mention Merida disappears after the archery contest her mom's response upon her return is "I was so worried!" Merida's response is to poison her. Granted, she was way off on the whole "a marriage will solve all our problems" bit. I mean, there's no way a marriage would make every clan happy in this movie's scenario. That's pretty obvious from the get go. Sure, she's a pretty traditional lady, what with the lack of combat knowledge and the cleanliness but, I'm all for her!
I will throw Merida a bone, she progresses miraculously throughout the movie and by the end of the story she turns into, well, a great woman very similar her mom.
And speaking of family relations, that is the number one thing I like the most about this movie: it portrays a fully functioning family with both a father and a mother that are actively engaged in the lives of their children. How often do you see that in mainstream entertainment? It is deeply refreshing. In fact, if you want my humble opinion (and obviously you do), if you want to know what makes strong, confident, young women it's parents that are involved in their children's lives.
As a final note: I watched Monster's University and was surprised by how much I didn't dislike it. What I wasn't impressed with is the Pixar short that accompanies it: Blue Umbrella. I'm pretty sure I've seen this short before, only it was called Johnnie Fedora and Alice Blue Bonnet and it came out as part of the movie Make Mine Music in 1946. C'mon Pixar, you can do better.
And this concludes my rather shameful year of Pixar.
Coming up next year: Studio Ghibli!
Friday, November 21, 2014
This is a Blog Title
So I'm at work right now, it's probably not the best place
in the world to be updating my blog but this is my second shift today and I'm
feeling tired and generally apathetic toward respecting rules right now. So
what the hey?
I have actually finished watching all the Pixar movies to
date and I mostly feel ashamed that it took me so long to watch 14 movies. I
keep wondering why it’s taken such a Herculean effort to get through a
relatively short number of fairly decent movie work. Did I seriously get
that burnt out from last year’s Disney marathon? Do I honestly dislike computer
animation that much that my subconscious animosity prevented me from sitting down
to watch them? Am I sick of the constantly positive storylines that we’re being
forced fed by the behemoth that is Disney/Pixar? Or was it simply the fact that my
apartment has lacked a DVD player since mid-march? Or that until recently
I didn’t have a laptop with a disk drive? Or the idea that if I chose to watch
these movies at a friend's place I’d have to tolerate them talking during the movie?
If I’m being completely honest it was probably a combination
of all of the above.
I’m also ashamed that due to my ineptitude I was unable to
watch any Studio Ghibli movies. Of course, there’s always next year :)
Ok, let’s do this!
Up! Is a movie that had the audacity to come out the week
after I left to go serve my LDS mission. I had to endure 18 torturous months
of having people tell me how heartwarming and tender this movie is without
being able to see it. It was truly tolerable; it actually wasn’t that bad at
all. I mostly felt the sting of missing this movie while I was in the MTC but I
soon forgot about it. That’s a pretty shocking idea coming from me, I
know…especially considering how many people I yelled at for talking about Big
Hero 6 in front of me before I’d had a chance to see it. And the extent of
those comments had been “It’s a good movie. You’ll like it!” (As a side note: I
hate it when people say this to me. You don’t get a say in what I will or will
not like! I’ll decide that thank you very much!)
Anyways, most people who dislike this movie are cold and
heartless and probably poachers. When I finally had the opportunity to watch Up
it naturally made me teary-eyed and sentimental about family and whatnot.
I also really enjoyed the commentary on the state of the
modern family: absentee parents, kids with a lack of understanding and a sense
of entitlement, arbitrary awards that mean nothing and show nothing but that
everyone puts so much value into for some reason.
All in all a really well made piece of storytelling.
Toy Story 3 came out shortly before I came home from my
mission and it was one of the first movies I saw in theaters upon my return
home. It was still showing at the local dollar theater and I went to see it
with a friend of mine after the date I was supposed to go see the movie with
bailed on me (it seriously was not a big deal so don’t put too much drama into
the above explanation of how I ended up seeing this movie). I remember it
fondly because we went to Wendy’s on our way to the theater and my friend snuck
in her Frosty after the usher told her she had to throw it away before she
entered the theater. Oh the rebellions that ensue with the movie theater
concessions!
Anywho, like any God-fearing American who was a child in the
90’s this movie made me crazy emotional. I probably got weepy-eyed, although I
can’t remember for sure. It was such a beautiful closing to a really phenomenal
saga and it made me feel like I was saying a very heartfelt farewell to my
childhood.
And then I heard about Toy Story 4 and my blood began to
boil.
SIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGH!!!!!!
And I’m going to pretend I didn’t watch Cars 2. The shame is
just too much for me to bare.
So the next movie on my list is Brave and I’m going to
refrain from blogging about that particular movie this time around since I have
a lot to say on the subject and it could get a little bit ranty.
Until next time.
Have a great weekend!
Monday, October 27, 2014
Hello Dolly!
Hey guys...
I am suffering from major burn out right now. I'm crazy tired of school, and work, and waking up in the morning. I'm also not interested in activities like folding my laundry and leaving my apartment. It's not really a good predicament I find myself in considering how much I need to be doing my homework and haven't been......
So naturally my solution to this problem is to catch up on my blog.
I love the movie Wall-e. It is easily my most favorite Pixar movie to date. And I have a tendency to consider people who don't like this movie (and I say this with all the loving kindness I can muster) as idiots who can't understand a compelling and thought provoking plot when they see one. That is a very high brow comment to make, I know, but I'm kind of high brow when it comes to animation so....
Seriously though, this movie is bold. It has an intelligent message that is portrayed well with an uplifting moral to the story found at the end. It is cinematically stunning. Its frugal amount of dialog emphasizes its visual splendor. In fact, I love how little talking actually takes place in this movie. I am understandably moved by the idea of using an image to explain a story and the spartan amount of talking that happens in this movie elevates it almost to the status of a silent film.
And the message in this movie! Wow! Talk about unexpected for a main stream animation studio to pull something that dystopian out and display it as family entertainment!
Of course, I'm a sucker for a good dystopian story. It is my favorite genre. I like it because it's a spectacular way to have an intelligent discourse on social commentary without flagrantly throwing it in people's faces. I will admit that Wall-e's message is a little bit more in your face than I usually care for and that aspect of this movie did take some time for me to get over; I still enjoy what the story of this little robot has to say about the human condition: The flagrant waste of first world nations, the monolithic rise of corporations taking over so many aspects of our daily lives, from the food we eat to the clothes we wear to the people we elect to public offices. Not to mention the laziness of the human populous, the lack of connection and physical interaction with our friends and neighbors, the disinterest in our surroundings due to the constant plug in to our virtual realities. All of this in a medium constantly referred to as "for kids"?! And people wonder why I get annoyed when this sort of label is put on the animation industry.
What sets this movie apart from the usual dystopian story line is its ultimately happy ending and positive message concerning the human condition. (Most dystopias I've read usually end with a "life sucks, there's nothing you can do about it" moral to the story.) This movie really has a very encouraging idea for humanity and the direction it could possibly take in the future. I mean, once the humans realize that they've messed up and that there's a problem that needs fixing they all band together to set things right. They overcome a psycho robot, wide spread obesity, and probably toxic air conditions and mass starvation in order to take care of the planet that they essentially abandoned hundreds of years before. Isn't that such an uplifting commentary on the human condition? That if we see something is wrong we take the action to ensure that it is put to rights.
This is, of course, an over generalization. Some people don't care to do anything to alleviate the suffering of a messed up world but there are countless individuals and organizations that do. And that is an inspiring idea.
Let's not forget the absolutely adorable love story. What's better than robot love?
And, lest I shame myself for not mentioning this, it is crucial that no one overlook the huge homage to Stanley Kubrick's sci-fi masterpiece: 2001: A Space Odyssey. In fact, I suggest to all people that they watch Wall-e with 2001 as a double feature. It will greatly enhance the experience for you, I guarantee it. Although do be warned that if you aren't familiar with 2001 please do some research before watching it! Or else only confusion and frustration will ensue.
Until next time!
I am suffering from major burn out right now. I'm crazy tired of school, and work, and waking up in the morning. I'm also not interested in activities like folding my laundry and leaving my apartment. It's not really a good predicament I find myself in considering how much I need to be doing my homework and haven't been......
So naturally my solution to this problem is to catch up on my blog.
I love the movie Wall-e. It is easily my most favorite Pixar movie to date. And I have a tendency to consider people who don't like this movie (and I say this with all the loving kindness I can muster) as idiots who can't understand a compelling and thought provoking plot when they see one. That is a very high brow comment to make, I know, but I'm kind of high brow when it comes to animation so....
Seriously though, this movie is bold. It has an intelligent message that is portrayed well with an uplifting moral to the story found at the end. It is cinematically stunning. Its frugal amount of dialog emphasizes its visual splendor. In fact, I love how little talking actually takes place in this movie. I am understandably moved by the idea of using an image to explain a story and the spartan amount of talking that happens in this movie elevates it almost to the status of a silent film.
And the message in this movie! Wow! Talk about unexpected for a main stream animation studio to pull something that dystopian out and display it as family entertainment!
Of course, I'm a sucker for a good dystopian story. It is my favorite genre. I like it because it's a spectacular way to have an intelligent discourse on social commentary without flagrantly throwing it in people's faces. I will admit that Wall-e's message is a little bit more in your face than I usually care for and that aspect of this movie did take some time for me to get over; I still enjoy what the story of this little robot has to say about the human condition: The flagrant waste of first world nations, the monolithic rise of corporations taking over so many aspects of our daily lives, from the food we eat to the clothes we wear to the people we elect to public offices. Not to mention the laziness of the human populous, the lack of connection and physical interaction with our friends and neighbors, the disinterest in our surroundings due to the constant plug in to our virtual realities. All of this in a medium constantly referred to as "for kids"?! And people wonder why I get annoyed when this sort of label is put on the animation industry.
What sets this movie apart from the usual dystopian story line is its ultimately happy ending and positive message concerning the human condition. (Most dystopias I've read usually end with a "life sucks, there's nothing you can do about it" moral to the story.) This movie really has a very encouraging idea for humanity and the direction it could possibly take in the future. I mean, once the humans realize that they've messed up and that there's a problem that needs fixing they all band together to set things right. They overcome a psycho robot, wide spread obesity, and probably toxic air conditions and mass starvation in order to take care of the planet that they essentially abandoned hundreds of years before. Isn't that such an uplifting commentary on the human condition? That if we see something is wrong we take the action to ensure that it is put to rights.
This is, of course, an over generalization. Some people don't care to do anything to alleviate the suffering of a messed up world but there are countless individuals and organizations that do. And that is an inspiring idea.
Let's not forget the absolutely adorable love story. What's better than robot love?
And, lest I shame myself for not mentioning this, it is crucial that no one overlook the huge homage to Stanley Kubrick's sci-fi masterpiece: 2001: A Space Odyssey. In fact, I suggest to all people that they watch Wall-e with 2001 as a double feature. It will greatly enhance the experience for you, I guarantee it. Although do be warned that if you aren't familiar with 2001 please do some research before watching it! Or else only confusion and frustration will ensue.
Until next time!
Monday, October 6, 2014
Anyone Can Cook!
Guess what ya'll? I got a new job at Ye Olde Local Public Library. As a result I get free movie rentals with no late fees! It's really boosted my Pixar watching substantially. It's also made my life a daily celebration because I love books!
I am 99% certain that Ratatouille was made with the sole intention of showing off. There are sequences in there that are so technically complicated I feel like the only reason they were created was to brag. Don't get me wrong, Ratatouille is fantastic, but it is very braggy.

Things I like about this movie:
Now that we're feeling all warm and sappy here are the things I don't like about this movie:
So I was going to try to fit the other three Pixar movies I've watched recently into this post but seeing as how those three are Wall-e, Up, and Toy Story 3 I will forego making this post any longer than it already is.
Until next time.
Anywho....
Things I like about this movie:
- A muted color palette. I'm always a fan of a limited use of color. And in this movie it works especially well to accentuate the vibrancy of food (or, the joys of our individual passions and aspirations, as symbolized by the food).
- Synesthetic rats. I'm not sure of synesthetic is the correct form of the word synesthesia (my computer is indicating to me that it's not even a word) but I'm talking about Remi's on screen description of what food tastes like. Let's face it, it's not quite possible to accurately depict what food tastes like without stuffing it in your face and digesting it, so the implementation of sounds and colors to describe flavors is pretty creative stuff. Kudos Pixar.
- "Anyone can cook." I love this saying. It's obviously applicable to more than just cooking and I follow this basic philosophy all the time with my pursuits in art. I'm a pretty big advocate of the concept that "anyone can draw." All it takes is the desire to do so. I get crazy peeved when I tell people I'm an illustration student and their response is "That's so cool! I can't even draw stick figures!" Or even worse: "I wish I could draw!" First off, yes, it is crazy cool that I'm an illustration major because I love what I'm studying. Secondly, don't write off stick figures as the lowest form of drawing there is, because it isn't. I start all of my figure drawings with a stick figure and we go over them a lot in my figure drawing classes. And finally, YOU AREN'T DEAD! You can learn how to draw! It's not some magical ability that has only been endowed upon the select few and all you other losers have to suck it. Drawing is a motor skill, just like writing. If you can learn to write you can learn to draw. The big distinction is WANTING to learn how to draw. Please stop telling me "I wish I could draw" and start making honest statements about how you aren't interested in investing the time it would take to learn a craft. There's no shame in that. Not all things have to appeal to all people. I hate math. I've never been interested in investing the time to become proficient in the field of algebra. You don't hear me whining about it or saying ridiculous things like "I wish I knew advanced calculus!" Gross. The very idea!
Now that we're feeling all warm and sappy here are the things I don't like about this movie:
- The short film "Your Friend the Rat." This is my only real issue with this movie and it's not even a real issue. I only have a complaint about it because currently there is a mouse that has decided to take up residence in my apartment. And hearing "interesting" facts about how high rats can jump and how their teeth are strong enough to gnaw through steel does not help me sleep at night. Granted, I know that I am cohabiting with a mouse and not a rat, they still come from the same rodent family and therefore have similar abilities. Stupid creepy little buggers with their nasty diseases and icky little tails.
Until next time.
Friday, August 15, 2014
2 Months in the Making: The Triumphant Return of Virginia's Blog!
Hey my darlings!
Guess what? I've watched two Pixar movies this week! AND I have things to say about both of them!!! Huzzah!
So, here are some words for you:
I watched Finding Nemo last Saturday. This movie makes me sad only because it is so good but it is so overplayed. It feels like every weekend it is on ABC Family or one of the five other stations that Disney owns. It really makes me not want to watch the movie.
The plot of this story is really what makes this movie. Although it's not much of an original story it's well told and that makes all the difference. Also, an odd amount of my oceanic knowledge comes from this movie, like how wales don't eat fish they eat krill and all about how to pronounce "anemone."
The color scheme of this entire movie could also be summed up in three colors: blue (duh), orange, and pink. If you put those three colors on a canvas Mark Rothko style and called it "Nemo" it would be a reasonable title to me.

Now, here's my one issue with this movie and, I'm realizing more and more, my issue with Pixar/computer animation in general. Realism. Computer animation has a tendency to want to try to make things look as close to reality as they possibly can. For example, take the recently released How to Train Your Dragon 2. Don't get me wrong, that was a stunningly beautiful movie but they tried to create such a heightened sense of reality in their character design that it was kind-of off putting.When a cartoon cries and the tears look real and you can see the pores of the skin on the character's face then what's the point of animating it? Why not just hire an actor to play the part? In any case, that's a tangent and isn't really at all the issue I have with Nemo. Nemo suffers from the problem that it attempts to mimic reality but is just slightly off. All the character design is just a little too flat. It seems to me that they put a lot of effort into creating a detailed and believable ocean and since they had to deal with the tricky lighting situations that water creates their characters suffer from it. Also, I'm a bit disappointed in their character designs as is. They're just too realistic. They just look like well...fish. Aside from a scar/gimpy fin these characters have no distinguishing features. You couldn't pick Marlin out of a crowd of clown fish. There's nothing interesting about the way he looks. Once again, if you're so stuck on creating reality what's the point in animating it? If you're going to draw a fish why not have fun doing it? Why not create something that's unique?
Whatever. I still like Finding Nemo. On to the next movie!

The Incredibles is an incredible movie. I always have a hard time remembering that I like this movie and convincing myself to sit down and watch it due to the unfortunate circumstance that I had the flu when I went and saw it and had a nasty experience with the toilet after the movie. (TMI?)
Anyways, I read an article online about how compositionally stunning this movie is and if I weren't so lazy I'd find it and post a link to it. It's also long which is why I didn't so much as read it as I did skimmed it briefly. But from what I could tell it was well researched and interesting!
What I love about Incredibles and what I think separates it from other computer animated movies is that they do not try to mimic reality. The character designs are interesting and although they are obviously human they are exaggerated enough that it doesn't give off that creepy "almost human" vibe.
Also, Brad Bird is a 1950's nostalgia nut. The Iron Giant deals so heavily with the Space Race and Communist fear and The Incredibles is an obvious homage to the fall from grace experienced by the super hero/comic book industry after World War II. If you haven't heard of the book "Seduction of the Innocent" by Fredric Wertham you should look into it. Although the topic of the book deals mostly with the violence of comic books and the subsequent delinquency it provoked in juveniles it had a hand in dealing out several mandates including very strict censorship in the comic book industry. Of course, the book was later debunked for using gross exaggerations and generally incorrect research practices. Unfortunately, the effects of the book were far reaching and in many ways the comic industry is still recovering from those allegations made 60 years ago.
This idea is made clear from the opening sequence as Mr. Incredible revels in the warm glow of admiration that comes from being a super hero and it all goes south in a matter of minutes when his apparently violent means of helping the innocent are unwanted and unappreciated. And now comes the hard reality of adjusting to a world that no longer wants you and tries to censor your very existence. It's actually a pretty sad premise if you think about it.
Another thing that's great in this movie is that it shows a fully functioning family with all it's flaws and arguments included. I always appreciate seeing a movie where both parents are present and actively involved in their children's lives. It's so rare in the media and so refreshing when it happens.
On a side note: Syndrome totally looks like Brad Bird.

Guess what?? Since this post has literally taken me two months to put together I actually watched Cars as well!! I don't have much to say about this movie because I strongly feel that the whole reason this movie was made (as well as its sequel/spin offs) was to sell merchandise to boys and that is disappointing to me. I also don't like movies where the premise is "rich guy living life in the fast lane learns life lessons from country folk in three days or less." Because sincere life changes happen over night (you can't see it but I'm rolling my eyes). Also, the idea of sentient cars raises too many questions that I'd rather not think about.
I do like the background imagery in this movie though.
Guess what? I've watched two Pixar movies this week! AND I have things to say about both of them!!! Huzzah!
So, here are some words for you:
I watched Finding Nemo last Saturday. This movie makes me sad only because it is so good but it is so overplayed. It feels like every weekend it is on ABC Family or one of the five other stations that Disney owns. It really makes me not want to watch the movie.
The plot of this story is really what makes this movie. Although it's not much of an original story it's well told and that makes all the difference. Also, an odd amount of my oceanic knowledge comes from this movie, like how wales don't eat fish they eat krill and all about how to pronounce "anemone."
The color scheme of this entire movie could also be summed up in three colors: blue (duh), orange, and pink. If you put those three colors on a canvas Mark Rothko style and called it "Nemo" it would be a reasonable title to me.

Now, here's my one issue with this movie and, I'm realizing more and more, my issue with Pixar/computer animation in general. Realism. Computer animation has a tendency to want to try to make things look as close to reality as they possibly can. For example, take the recently released How to Train Your Dragon 2. Don't get me wrong, that was a stunningly beautiful movie but they tried to create such a heightened sense of reality in their character design that it was kind-of off putting.When a cartoon cries and the tears look real and you can see the pores of the skin on the character's face then what's the point of animating it? Why not just hire an actor to play the part? In any case, that's a tangent and isn't really at all the issue I have with Nemo. Nemo suffers from the problem that it attempts to mimic reality but is just slightly off. All the character design is just a little too flat. It seems to me that they put a lot of effort into creating a detailed and believable ocean and since they had to deal with the tricky lighting situations that water creates their characters suffer from it. Also, I'm a bit disappointed in their character designs as is. They're just too realistic. They just look like well...fish. Aside from a scar/gimpy fin these characters have no distinguishing features. You couldn't pick Marlin out of a crowd of clown fish. There's nothing interesting about the way he looks. Once again, if you're so stuck on creating reality what's the point in animating it? If you're going to draw a fish why not have fun doing it? Why not create something that's unique?
Whatever. I still like Finding Nemo. On to the next movie!
The Incredibles is an incredible movie. I always have a hard time remembering that I like this movie and convincing myself to sit down and watch it due to the unfortunate circumstance that I had the flu when I went and saw it and had a nasty experience with the toilet after the movie. (TMI?)
Anyways, I read an article online about how compositionally stunning this movie is and if I weren't so lazy I'd find it and post a link to it. It's also long which is why I didn't so much as read it as I did skimmed it briefly. But from what I could tell it was well researched and interesting!
What I love about Incredibles and what I think separates it from other computer animated movies is that they do not try to mimic reality. The character designs are interesting and although they are obviously human they are exaggerated enough that it doesn't give off that creepy "almost human" vibe.
Also, Brad Bird is a 1950's nostalgia nut. The Iron Giant deals so heavily with the Space Race and Communist fear and The Incredibles is an obvious homage to the fall from grace experienced by the super hero/comic book industry after World War II. If you haven't heard of the book "Seduction of the Innocent" by Fredric Wertham you should look into it. Although the topic of the book deals mostly with the violence of comic books and the subsequent delinquency it provoked in juveniles it had a hand in dealing out several mandates including very strict censorship in the comic book industry. Of course, the book was later debunked for using gross exaggerations and generally incorrect research practices. Unfortunately, the effects of the book were far reaching and in many ways the comic industry is still recovering from those allegations made 60 years ago.
This idea is made clear from the opening sequence as Mr. Incredible revels in the warm glow of admiration that comes from being a super hero and it all goes south in a matter of minutes when his apparently violent means of helping the innocent are unwanted and unappreciated. And now comes the hard reality of adjusting to a world that no longer wants you and tries to censor your very existence. It's actually a pretty sad premise if you think about it.
Another thing that's great in this movie is that it shows a fully functioning family with all it's flaws and arguments included. I always appreciate seeing a movie where both parents are present and actively involved in their children's lives. It's so rare in the media and so refreshing when it happens.
On a side note: Syndrome totally looks like Brad Bird.
Guess what?? Since this post has literally taken me two months to put together I actually watched Cars as well!! I don't have much to say about this movie because I strongly feel that the whole reason this movie was made (as well as its sequel/spin offs) was to sell merchandise to boys and that is disappointing to me. I also don't like movies where the premise is "rich guy living life in the fast lane learns life lessons from country folk in three days or less." Because sincere life changes happen over night (you can't see it but I'm rolling my eyes). Also, the idea of sentient cars raises too many questions that I'd rather not think about.
I do like the background imagery in this movie though.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








